VerseDB relies on contributors to maintain accurate, well-sourced comic data. This guide covers standards for accuracy, handling conflicts between sources, mature content, and quality expectations.
Note
For detailed formatting rules, field-specific guidelines, and character limits, see our Content Edit Guidelines and Best Practices article.
Accuracy Standards
Every submission must be based on verifiable facts, not guesses or assumptions.
Rule
If you can't verify something, leave it blank. Incomplete data is better than incorrect data.
- Verify information against official publisher sources
- Use printed comic credits as your primary reference
- Cross-reference multiple sources for important details
- Document your sources in submission notes
- Submit speculation or fan theories as facts
- Guess dates, credits, or publication details
- Rely on a single unverified source
- Add information just to fill in blanks
Verification Standards
Different edits require different levels of verification:
| Edit Type | Sources Required | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Simple | 1 source | Typo fixes, formatting |
| Standard | 2 sources | Descriptions, dates, credits |
| Complex | 3+ sources | Relationship changes, major additions |
Handling Conflicting Sources
Sometimes sources disagree. When that happens, follow this hierarchy:
Quick Summary
Example
If a printed comic credits Writer A but a website lists Writer B, trust the printed comic.
When Sources Conflict
Check for context first:
- Is one source newer and correcting an error?
- Are they referring to different editions (original vs reprint)?
- Could this be a retcon or editorial change?
If no clear resolution exists, document both versions:
"Note: Sources conflict on [detail]. [Source 1] states [X], while [Source 2] indicates [Y]."
Tip
Publisher corrections, reprints with updated credits, and retcons are common in comics. When documenting these, note the original version and when/where it was changed.
Writing Quality Standards
Descriptions should be clear, neutral, and concise. See the Content Edit Guidelines and Best Practices article for character limits and content-specific guidelines.
Tone and Language
- Write in third person ("Batman is..." not "You play as...")
- Use neutral, factual language
- State verifiable claims ("Won the Eisner Award")
- Keep present tense for current info, past tense for history
- Include personal opinions ("the best run ever")
- Use promotional language ("Don't miss this epic saga!")
- Sensationalize content
- Write in first or second person
Spoiler Policy
Series and character descriptions:
- General premise and setup are fine
- Avoid major plot reveals
- Historical events are acceptable for completed series
Issue descriptions:
- Spoilers are allowed but should be marked
- Use: "[SPOILERS] This issue reveals..."
- Focus on setup rather than outcomes when possible
Mature Content Policy
VerseDB uses content ratings to help users make informed choices.
Age Ratings
Use the official rating provided by the publisher. Common systems include:
Marvel: All Ages, T (12+), T+ (15+), Parental Advisory (17+), Explicit (18+)
DC: Everyone, Teen (12+), Teen Plus (15+), Mature (17+)
Warning
Never create your own ratings. Use the publisher's official classification or leave the field blank if unknown.
NSFW Flag
Set the is_nsfw flag for content containing:
- Graphic violence or gore
- Sexual content or nudity
- Strong language throughout
- Disturbing or intense themes
Note
The NSFW flag affects how content displays across the site. When in doubt, mark it.
Content Warnings
For mature-rated content, mention themes factually in descriptions:
"Content Warning: Contains graphic violence and strong language."
Keep it brief and professional. Don't sensationalize or provide excessive detail about mature content.
Prohibited Content
Rule
Never submit or link to: unauthorized scans, pirated comics, leaked previews, fan-made explicit content, or illegal download sites.
Allowed materials include official publisher previews, solicitation images, and verified promotional content.
Enforcement
How Edits Are Reviewed
Moderators evaluate submissions against these standards:
- Is the information verifiable?
- Are sources cited appropriately?
- Does the content meet quality standards?
- Are ratings and flags set correctly?
Consequences for Violations
Repeated issues may result in:
- Edit rejections with feedback
- Slower review times
- Contribution restrictions
Tip
Focus on quality over quantity. A strong approval rate shows moderators you're a reliable contributor.