VerseDB relies on contributors to maintain accurate, well-sourced comic data. This guide covers standards for accuracy, handling conflicts between sources, mature content, and quality expectations.
Note
For detailed formatting rules, field-specific guidelines, and character limits, see our Content Edit Guidelines and Best Practices article.
Accuracy Standards#
Every submission must be based on verifiable facts, not guesses or assumptions.
Rule
If you can't verify something, leave it blank. Incomplete data is better than incorrect data.
- Verify information against official publisher sources
- Use printed comic credits as your primary reference
- Cross-reference multiple sources for important details
- Document your sources in submission notes
- Submit speculation or fan theories as facts
- Guess dates, credits, or publication details
- Rely on a single unverified source
- Add information just to fill in blanks
Verification Standards#
Different edits require different levels of verification:
| Edit Type | Sources Required | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Simple | 1 source | Typo fixes, formatting |
| Standard | 2 sources | Descriptions, dates, credits |
| Complex | 3+ sources | Relationship changes, major additions |
Handling Conflicting Sources#
Sometimes sources disagree. When that happens, follow this hierarchy:
Example
If a printed comic credits Writer A but a website lists Writer B, trust the printed comic.
When Sources Conflict#
Check for context first:
- Is one source newer and correcting an error?
- Are they referring to different editions (original vs reprint)?
- Could this be a retcon or editorial change?
If no clear resolution exists, document both versions:
"Note: Sources conflict on [detail]. [Source 1] states [X], while [Source 2] indicates [Y]."
Tip
Publisher corrections, reprints with updated credits, and retcons are common in comics. When documenting these, note the original version and when/where it was changed.
Writing Quality Standards#
Descriptions should be clear, neutral, and concise. See the Content Edit Guidelines and Best Practices article for character limits and content-specific guidelines.
Tone and Language#
- Write in third person ("Batman is..." not "You play as...")
- Use neutral, factual language
- State verifiable claims ("Won the Eisner Award")
- Keep present tense for current info, past tense for history
- Include personal opinions ("the best run ever")
- Use promotional language ("Don't miss this epic saga!")
- Sensationalize content
- Write in first or second person
Spoiler Policy#
Series and character descriptions:
- General premise and setup are fine
- Avoid major plot reveals
- Historical events are acceptable for completed series
Issue descriptions:
- Spoilers are allowed but should be marked
- Use: "[SPOILERS] This issue reveals..."
- Focus on setup rather than outcomes when possible
Mature Content Policy#
VerseDB uses content ratings to help users make informed choices.
Age Ratings#
Use the official rating provided by the publisher. Common systems include:
Marvel: All Ages, T (12+), T+ (15+), Parental Advisory (17+), Explicit (18+)
DC: Everyone, Teen (12+), Teen Plus (15+), Mature (17+)
Warning
Never create your own ratings. Use the publisher's official classification or leave the field blank if unknown.
NSFW Flag#
Set the is_nsfw flag for content containing:
- Graphic violence or gore
- Sexual content or nudity
- Strong language throughout
- Disturbing or intense themes
Note
The NSFW flag affects how content displays across the site. When in doubt, mark it.
Content Warnings#
For mature-rated content, mention themes factually in descriptions:
"Content Warning: Contains graphic violence and strong language."
Keep it brief and professional. Don't sensationalize or provide excessive detail about mature content.
Prohibited Content#
Rule
Never submit or link to: unauthorized scans, pirated comics, leaked previews, fan-made explicit content, or illegal download sites.
Allowed materials include official publisher previews, solicitation images, and verified promotional content.
Enforcement#
How Edits Are Reviewed#
Moderators evaluate submissions against these standards:
- Is the information verifiable?
- Are sources cited appropriately?
- Does the content meet quality standards?
- Are ratings and flags set correctly?
Consequences for Violations#
Repeated issues may result in:
- Edit rejections with feedback
- Slower review times
- Contribution restrictions
Tip
Focus on quality over quantity. A strong approval rate shows moderators you're a reliable contributor.